Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, or generally SBF, had requested Decide Lewis Kaplan to postpone his sentence listening to for 4 to 6 weeks, however the decide dismissed his request.
Attorneys for Bankman-Fried’s protection mentioned that extra time is required to assemble proof for the sentencing submission and to be prepared for the pre-sentencing interview, which is about for December 21.
Lawyer Mark Cohen of Cohen & Gresser submitted a letter on December twentieth, requesting a postponement of the sentencing listening to slated for March 28, 2024, and his presentencing interview scheduled for Thursday, December twenty first.
SBF: Delaying Techniques
Bankman-Fried’s authorized counsels additionally sought to reap the benefits of the extra time to prepare for any costs that could be dropped from the primary trial; a retrial is about for March 11. The attorneys proposed January 5, 2024, and February 2, 2024, because the scheduled dates for disclosures associated to the presentence investigation report.
Cohen acknowledged that the protection has not heard again from the federal government regardless of reaching out to them to request their consent. He additionally identified that this was the primary try of SBF to have the listening to postponed.
No Extra Extension, Decide Says
Kaplan forbade alterations to the timetable, and famous that Bankman-Fried had already been granted one extension to file his sentencing statements, and the protection had not objected to the date of sentencing when it was established.
Through the second trial, the prosecution alleged that Bankman-Fried participated in an illegal marketing campaign financing conspiracy by donating round $100 million to politicians. Following the Bahamas’ refusal to extradite Bankman-Fried on the cost, the federal government subsequently dropped the costs.
Alternatively, Bankman-Fried’s attorneys contended that sentence ought to begin as quickly because the withdrawn counts are settled. Cohen proposed that it could be simply and environment friendly to mix all related conduct right into a single sentence listening to if the trial on the separated counts takes place on March 11.
Nov. 2 noticed the conviction of Bankman-Fried on all counts pertaining to fraud and different offenses at FTX and Alameda Analysis, a sister firm.
Not Responsible Plea
Following his not responsible plea to all costs and his insistence on his innocence following the jury’s ruling, Bankman-Fried made an effort to disassociate himself from essential selections, attributing varied features and danger administration errors to different executives.
Though the previous FTX CEO may obtain a most sentence of 110 years in jail, many authorized specialists predict a a lot decrease time period. In response to sure calculations, he may spend much less time behind bars than 25 years.
Damian Williams, the US Lawyer for the Southern District of New York, known as the offenses made by SBF “a multibillion-dollar scheme aimed to make him the king of crypto” and thought of them to be among the many largest monetary scams in American historical past.
Different important FTX officers entered responsible pleas to numerous crimes and testified in opposition to SBF all through the trial. These executives included former Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison, FTX co-founder Gary Wang, and former FTX engineering chief Nishad Singh.
Featured picture from Pixabay
